|
One slide at a time' is the title of an ongoing series debunking the false information and intentional deception that was rampant throughout the Point Reyes / TNC webinar on targeted grazing. Today we focus on one slide from Point Reyes National Seashore's range manager, Dylan Voeller's presentation. This slide was presented by Dylan Voeller to show the benefits of using cattle to achieve “specific ecological goals” within Point Reyes National Seashore (On a related note, despite an hour-long presentation, viewers still don’t know exactly what these goals are despite them being vaguely referenced numerous times.) My claim is that the only thing you are actually seeing in this slide is what a field of velvet grass (which should have never been allowed to reach this stage in the first place) looks like after cattle have been fed. What’s missing from Dylan’s presentation? Very basic information, such as:
Without any of the bullet-pointed information listed above you are looking at nothing more than shortened vegetation. From there, if you want to support Dylan’s stance, you have to assume based on faith that this photo indicates that something good has taken place and that other good things will follow. Why would I want to know where and when the image was taken? Well, the webinar repeatedly claimed that they were going to be very transparent with this process and so forthcoming with information that it would be “more than we could have wanted.” With that in mind, I personally want to go look at this location to observe whether any actual benefits have taken place since the time the photo was taken. I want to know when it was taken so I can understand the time of year the grazing took place and so I have an idea of when it might be worthwhile to go back and check the status of this area. Conveniently, since this is an undisclosed location, I won’t be able to independently prove any of my points. Not at this spot anyway. Based on my experience, the shortened velvet grass immediately resumed growing (it is not an annual grass) while thousands of seeds from the plants that were being grazed and trampled made their way into the soil. Additional seeds left this area and were carried by the cattle via their hooves and hair to more areas. The fact that this grass is not an annual species indicates that using cattle is not a wise approach if the goal is to get rid of the plant. Although we often refer to cattle as grazers, as the photo illustrates, these cattle actually browsed more so than grazed, which is why you can still see velvet grass, albeit shortened, on the left. Now I will discuss the “native, rare species”, which, thanks to Dylan’s lack of information, we have to refer to in this vague manner rather than knowing exactly which species we are talking about. I often find native plants trying to grow despite the dominance of invasive plants surrounding them. Sometimes they succeed, sometimes they fail, but either way these plants were somewhere in that field of tall velvet grass. As you can see on the left, none of those plants are present, meaning, not only did the cattle consume and trample those native plants, but they most likely were consumed first. When the cattle are brought back to this area to once again shorten the velvet grass that regrew, whatever recovery the native plants achieved will once again be brought to an end.
What all of this means is that Dylan’s targeted grazing slide actually showed us the opposite of what it’s supposed to be showing us. This is what the prevention of the return of native plants looks like. This is what the reseeding and spreading of velvet grass looks like. This is what using Point Reyes National Seashore to continue to fatten cattle for the animal agriculture industry looks like. Back to my original claim; the slide just shows you what it looks like when livestock have been fattened. And yes, they will be slaughtered and a rancher somewhere will financially benefit from livestock consuming plants in your national park. #pointreyes #targetedgrazing #dylanvoeller #skylerthomas #watchinghumans #shameofpointreyes
0 Comments
Dylan Voeller's portion of the TNC / PRNS Targeted Grazing webinar was particularly long, thus particularly hard to get through. The false claims that he made were so numerous that I have had to break my analyzation of his slides into multiple videos. On the October 6th live show, Laura Cunningham will join to validate my scrutiny or set me straight. Is the national park's "range manager" being honest with the public, or is he acting as a puppet for the ranching industry? Add your thoughts and your questions during the livestream, beginning at 10 AM. Point Reyes National Seashore's range manager exposes himself as just another cattle industry puppet. Laura Cunningham, California Director of Western Watersheds Project, joins the show again to challenge a few specific claims made in The Nature Conservancy / PRNS targeted grazing webinar.
This time Dylan Voeller, the park’s so-called range manager, will be the target of our scrutiny. For Laura’s sake I will attempt to be professional, but the absurdity coming from this park staff member actually caused me to laugh out loud a few times. Laura will provide actual expertise as I point out claims from Dylan’s slides that I find questionable, if not completely dishonest. Dylan’s portion of the webinar was rather long so I’ve narrowed down the focus of the show to his claims regarding purple velvet grass and his villainization of native vegetation, such as yellow bush lupine. A playlist already exists of my solo breakdowns of these webinar slides for those who are interested. A Webinar of Laughs: Live Breakdown of PRNS Targeted Grazing Presentation #dylanvoeller #rangemanager #pointreyes #skylerthomas #watchinghumans #thenatureconservancy I've already finished several breakdowns of this egregious webinar, which can be watched at this link, a playlist of the webinar.
Tomorrow on the live show I have the opportunity to interview Dr. Joseph Scalia III, Psya D., regarding his recent publication; Who Wants to Kill a Wolf?
This topic has been on my mind for a decade so I'm very excited to hear a psychoanalyst share his thoughts. Be sure to watch so you can post your questions and have them answered on the live show!
#wolf #psychopath #killers #drscalia #psychoanalyst
When it comes to society’s competing viewpoints on the trophy hunting and commercial trapping of wolves, a number of angles exist. Already in the public discourse and thereby available to collective awareness, regardless of positions taken, are especially the voices of science, of ranching, of environmentalism, and of human-animal ethics. There is even the voice of the social sciences, in general, arguing for a new narrative.
read more here join the live interview and post your questions here
Erik Molvar returns to the Tuesday morning live show to discuss and offer insights regarding the unmistakable connection between the logging industry, livestock industry, and increased fire risk. While selling the public a false claim of trying to make us safer, these destructive industries are finding new ways to profit while the planet plunges deeper into extreme fire conditions.
The industries driving the West’s fire crisis are selling logging and livestock grazing as the cure, and taxpayers, wildlife and the land are paying the price. I can't do better than the title of the original written publication so I am reusing both the title and the subtitle. Tune in to listen and post questions that you would like to have answered during the show!
Erik Molvar Explains the Connection Between Cheatgrass and Cattle.
Erik Molvar wrote a piece that caught my attention titled, 'Log It, Graze it, then Watch it Burn. The piece is very similar to conversations I've had with George Wuerthner on my show regarding fire conditions opposed to fire fuel. I've often connected the logging industry to the cattle industry since forests are often chopped down under the guise of controlling wild fires, when the reality is that forests are replaced by highly flammable cheatgrass which provides an excuse to bring in cattle to control that grass via grazing. More specifically, in this episode I ask Erik about the relationship of cattle when it comes to the survival or doom of native perennial bunch grasses and nonnative annual cheat grass. Erik Molvar ~ Western Watersheds Project’s Executive Director. Erik cut his teeth in conservation in the field, doing more than half a million acres of wilderness inventory in Wyoming’s Red Desert and Medicine Bow Mountains. This led to a leadership position fighting oil and gas projects in Wyoming during the Bush administration. His signature accomplishment is defeating the 1,240-well Seminoe Road Coalbed Methane Project during that time. He wrote comprehensive, science-based conservation alternatives for federal land-use plans involving lands in the Red Desert, the Bighorn Basin, and the Medicine Bow National Forest. He spent 13 years as a conservation advocate and later Executive Director of Wyoming-based Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, and led WildEarth Guardians’ Sagebrush Sea Campaign for three years. Over this period, he became a national leader in sage grouse conservation and recovery. Molvar is a wildlife biologist with published research in the behavior, ecology, and population dynamics of Alaskan moose as well as large-scale conservation planning. His scientific research helped establish that predation risk led to the evolution of herd-forming behavior in Alaskan moose, and he also helped to elucidate the role that moose play in accelerating nutrient cycling in timberline areas of Denali National Park. He has also worked on Forest Service stream survey crews and as a biological technician for the Corps of Engineers barging juvenile salmon and steelhead down the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Prior to becoming a professional conservation advocate, Molvar traveled the West as a hiking guide author. He is the author of 16 hiking guidebooks and backpacking techniques manuals for national parks and wilderness areas spanning the West from Alaska to Arizona, including Hiking Glacier and Waterton Lakes National Parks, Hiking Zion and Bryce Canyon National Parks, and Alaska on Foot: Wilderness Techniques for the Far North. He also was managing editor for Wyoming’s Red Desert: A Photographic Journey, was a managing editor for the official interagency commemorative book for the 50th Anniversary of the Wilderness Act, and has contributed writing and professional photography to a number of other books, both nonfiction and literature. Erik is a contributor to The Hill and his columns in that newspaper can be found he #wildlfire #deception #cattle #livestock #logging #skylerthomas #erikmolvar #pointreyes
Today's live show features a very special guest for anyone who has been dying to answer specific questions about rangeland ecology. In Point Reyes we have a very different sort of rangeland ecologist in that the so-called scientist is really there to defend livestock grazing. By contrast, today we will talk to someone who not only speaks without the pressure of the livestock industry guiding his words, but can share first-hand experience of witnessing nature's recovery once livestock have been removed.
Be sure to join the show to have your questions answered! 10 AM Pacific! Paul Ruprecht is the Nevada Director at Western Watersheds Project. He holds a J.D. from Lewis & Clark Law School and a master’s degree in Rangeland Ecology and Management from Colorado State University. He previously managed a 10,000-acre conservation preserve in northern Nevada, overseeing restoration and documenting ecological recovery following the removal of livestock. The Nature Conservancy, which has been increasingly exposed for lining the pockets of ranchers rather than actually helping nature, gave a webinar August 12th, 2026, which revealed what many feared. There was no inclusion of nature in their so-called restoration plan for Point Reyes National Seashore. The entire webinar centered around bringing in even more cattle (in addition to cattle still grazing from the south end to the north end of the park.). Even if you are a supporter of cattle grazing, one should be very concerned that cattle grazing is their entire plan. How about a few other ideas? Perhaps engage in other forms of restoration in addition to the absurd cattle grazing plan.
Laura Cunningham, of The Western Watershed Project, will be joining my podcast on Tuesday August 12th to give a rundown of the many flaws she noticed in TNC's presentation. Below is the link to be notified for the live show. When the TNC agreement was announced, on January 8th of 2025, wildlife advocates began celebrating that the elk would be able to roam freely while the ranching community complained about the end of cattle grazing in the seashore. A year and a half laterI can't help but point out that the opposite is closer to reality. The elk fence itself is still mostly in place while the miles of barbed wire fencing of the ranches also remain and continue to hinder wildlife movement. Cattle have been grazing the seashore every single day since the announcement and are still there today.The elk are not free and ranching is not gone. Yet the ranchers got paid. To leave. Again. Former McClure Ranch had cattle stretching from one end of the horizon to the other as shown here on December 5th, 2026, nearly a year after the TNC announcement. As of today, August 4th, cattle continue to graze from the southern end of the seashore to the northern end while elk continue to be hindered by both the fences and the cattle.
Help this documentation continue with a tax deductible donation: https://donate.mazloweb.com/donate/exposing-the-tnc-s-cattle-agenda For the last year the rancher-influenced media outlets have repeatedly stated that ranching families were “evicted” and that elk are now roaming free. People being evicted aren’t usually paid, much less paid millions. This was a voluntary exit by some ranchers and the fact that it was only some and not those who CHOSE to stay proves that the use of the word evicted is dishonest and inaccurate and yet the word is used repeatedly by so-called professional journalists. The reality is that ranching still remains in the seashore and cattle can be seen from the north end to the south end. Meanwhile, elk and other wildlife are still restricted by the 100s of miles of rancher barbed-wire fencing that has not been taken down and 90% of the elk fence itself is still up.
What else remains true is that the most degraded land is ranch land or former ranch land. These areas host both the greatest number of species and greatest density of invasive plants, including, but not limited to the annual fire fuel weeds that ranchers claim the cattle are required to combat. The ranch residences and barn structures continue to be a testament that even where rancher workers resided, no one did anything to stop invasive plants or promote positive vegetation, much less there be a need to go examine adjacent g fields grazed by cattle. By contrast, the further one is away from both the ranching structures and the grazed fields, the less invasive fire fuel plants there are. Even during the decades of active ranching, strips of native plant vegetation between the ranch parcels where cattle weren’t allowed continue to be the only healthy native plant and naturally fire-resistant vegetation in the seashore, along with the elk reserve. But we also have all the ranch lands outside the seashore serving as examples…one does not need to enter Point Reyes to already be exposed to a never-ending visual testament that ranch lands are either dead or full of fire fuel grasses and thistles, while the “un-ranched” lands are the healthiest, greenest, and most likely to resist fire. If the TNC and ranchers want to demonstrate the effectiveness of targeted grazing in restoring native plant life and reducing annual fire fuel plants, they can do this outside the seashore. The public does not need to give up THEIR national park to pretend to demonstrate something that has failed to be demonstrated anywhere ever. The land, anxious for a chance to heal itself, does not need to be hindered from recovery due to this farce of regenerative grazing. The wildlife need not continue to suffer so that the pockets of ranchers continue to be lined while the public are fed a never ending buffet of lies and propaganda from the very same people financially benefitting from the spread of these lies. This playlist is an entire day of documentation (July 16th 2026) and is one of many playlists available. The video below is the first of the 7-16-26 documentation vidieos. Stop listening to rancher propaganda and LOOK AT THE PROOF in front of you.
Below is a short rant I recorded expressing frustration at the complete nonsense the Point Reyes Light is getting away with (members only)
Below is a much longer video, our live show, discussing the same Point Reyes Light article.
Sasha Gennet is a fake scientist, a sellout, an embarrassment to the scientific community
For those who want to read the full article, please click this link. https://www.patreon.com/posts/point-reyes-tnc-147038183?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link.
Introducing 'Truth Trips', a series of funding campaigns to debunk ranch propaganda first hand. The ask is simple, help cover travel expenses and compensate to the time spent filming, editing, and fact-checking the relentless lies being fed to the public.
Campaign one seeks to document the state of each ranch in Point Reyes as they currently exist in order to counter future lies about why the ranchers were needed. I'd like to thank Karin P. Lease for being the first to donate to this campaign! Thank you! Below is the tax deductible donation link. Other ways to support are by joining the associated Patreon or by using PayPal to donate. |
TAX DEDUCTIBLEThis project is independent and self-funded. The time and financial investment is significant. Support is greatly needed and appreciated.
|

